People complaining about how this is pornography: its not technically pornography. if it were pornography it'd be a recognizable humanoid figure and have some realistic aspect of it which it doesn't. it's abstract.
It also has a filter on it. Therefore it's correctly marked as nsfw, and not breaking rules.
Also implying dA actually gives a fuck about its own rules
I love how so many people are fighting over rules when this was voted by the site for a DD... also, I see no realistic erection. And certainly no fluids. *shrug* This drawing is stunning and beautiful.
• Sexual body fluids (actual or simulated). There should be no depiction of semen or vaginal lubricants.
• Erections. There should be no use of imagery depicting an erect penis, however there may be exceptions granted to illustrations created for legitimate medical or educational purposes.
Way to go, admins, for never following your own freaking rules that YOU invented. I'll tell you what. If you're not going to enforce your rules, why don't you just take them off? Hell, dedicate a whole section to artistic pornography. While you're at it, why don't you create a section for re-colours and stolen artwork, because I know you love that stuff too much to delete it too.
Problem with the children seeing all this porn? Not a problem. Let all kids under the age of thirteen join, because we all know that there are so many who already have joined, and just tell them to leave the mature block on.
This is a great plan! It will sure save us good, rule-following people some time, since we report stuff all the time and you guys ignore it.